Advanced Search
    SI Wen, QIAN Cui-zhu, LIN Ken, ZHU Shu-xiu, LU Ming-hua. Comparison of Internal Standard Method and Standard Addition Method in the ICP-MS Determination of Arsenic in Tipping Paper for Cigarettes[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART B:CHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 51(11): 1552-1556. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-hx201511014
    Citation: SI Wen, QIAN Cui-zhu, LIN Ken, ZHU Shu-xiu, LU Ming-hua. Comparison of Internal Standard Method and Standard Addition Method in the ICP-MS Determination of Arsenic in Tipping Paper for Cigarettes[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART B:CHEMICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 51(11): 1552-1556. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-hx201511014

    Comparison of Internal Standard Method and Standard Addition Method in the ICP-MS Determination of Arsenic in Tipping Paper for Cigarettes

    • A comparative study on the effectiveness of the internal standard method (ISM) and standard addition method (SAM) as applied to the ICP-MS determination of arsenic in tipping paper for cigarettes was made. As shown by the experimental results,values of detection limits of 11.10 ng·L-1,14.70 ng·L-1; of RSD′s (n=6) of 3.4%,3.2%; and of recovery ranged from 94.3%-104%,91.4%-98.2% were found for ISM and SAM respectively. As tested by the matching T-test,no significant difference of analytical results was shown by the two methods. It was concluded that the ISM was better to be applied to samples of tipping paper with simple additive composition,while the SAM was more favorable to be used for samples with complex additive composition,especially those added with mixture of TiO2 and mica,for matching the matrix.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return